[OTDev] RDF size and use of prefixes
Egon Willighagen egon.willighagen at gmail.comFri May 20 11:06:12 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [OTDev] RDF size and use of prefixes
- Next message: [OTDev] RDF size and use of prefixes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hej Nina, On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Nina Jeliazkova <jeliazkova.nina at gmail.com> wrote: > But what I am wondering is why having > > @prefix otm: <http://webservices.in-silico.ch/model> . > > doesn't help to have > > ot:hasSource otm:124 ; > > instead of > > ot:hasSource <http://webservices.in-silico.ch/model/124> ; > > Any ideas? The model URI is repeating many times, it will be quite a gain > if it is prefixed. Yes, see below. >> But that a valid QName :( >> >> In that respect, it would be good for a future OpenTox API to have the >> last bit a valid NCName, so starting with a 'a-Z' or '_': >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-NameStartChar > > Hm, does this mean it's actually the numbers that are messing up with the > RDF prefixes ? Yes. > It will be trivial to add an alphabetical first char to any > of the URIs. Yes, I think so. I just filed this report for AMBIT: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3304986&group_id=191756&atid=938660 Summarizing, it should have worked if the resource would have been: http://webservices.in-silico.ch/model/m124 allowing: otm:m124 (Worked for me in ChEMBL-RDF) Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Researcher Institutet för miljömedicin Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
- Previous message: [OTDev] RDF size and use of prefixes
- Next message: [OTDev] RDF size and use of prefixes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list