[OTDev] OpenAM performance
Nina Jeliazkova jeliazkova.nina at gmail.comMon Jul 11 10:33:01 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [OTDev] OpenAM performance
- Next message: [OTDev] OpenAM performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11 July 2011 11:24, Andreas Maunz <andreas at maunz.de> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:04:58 +0300, Nina Jeliazkova > <jeliazkova.nina at gmail.com> wrote: > > The modified version of Policy service is also available at > > https://github.com/vedina/Pol > > > > 1) table structure slightly modified > > 2) added connection pool (c3p0) for handling MySQL connection > > 3) the presence of tokens is verified first, then all other actions are > > taken (this solves the issue reported by Vedrin) > > 4) improved exception handling > > 5) refactored as a maven project (besides all the maven goodies, now one > can > > test it locally by running mvn tomcat:run , without explicitly installing > a > > servlet container) > > 6) other minor refactoring for better readability > > Hi Nina, thank you for reviewing and improving on the Pol service code. > > Indeed Vedrin has pointed earlier to issue 3), which I should have > already fixed. > > > To summarize, an improved version of OpenTox AA (with the newest OpenAM > and > > policies extracted from the current setup and imported into the new one) > can > > be setup in few days, and will have a better response time and > scalability > > than currently. There is still a problem with increased latency of bulk > > delete of policies (bulk means deleting several tens of thousands > policies) > > , but as far as I understood, for few tens of policies (as is in the > > validation use case), there is no such problem. Vedrin will be sending > more > > details about the outcome from the extensive OpenAM experiments he is > > performing since the last week. > > We can probably best discuss in the meeting, where and when to set up > the new service. > Yes indeed. > I am not a fanatic about cloud vs standard deployments, but would > generally prefer a cloud-based solution, mainly for reasons of easier > manageability. > > Let me just point at an advertised difference between Jiffybox and most > cloud services, which is the dedicated resources (in German: > https://www.jiffybox.de/faq_index.html). I have experienced very good > performance with JB so far. > I don't have anything against the current cloud solution, if it offers reasonable performance / price rate :) Best regards, Nina > > Best regards > Andreas > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development at opentox.org > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
- Previous message: [OTDev] OpenAM performance
- Next message: [OTDev] OpenAM performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list