[OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
Pantelis Sopasakis chvng at mail.ntua.grMon Aug 22 21:09:03 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
- Next message: [OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Christoph, and thanks a lot for the input. On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 18:43 +0200, Christoph Helma wrote: > Dear Pantelis, > > > > Some IST models cannot be parsed. Jena says: > > SEVERE: qedit.task.ImportModel at ec1c4d failed: > > com.hp.hpl.jena.ontology.ConversionException: Cannot convert node > > "http://www.opentox.org/api/1.1#ModelPrediction"^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string to OntClass: it does not have rdf:type owl:Class or equivalent > > com.hp.hpl.jena.ontology.ConversionException: Cannot convert node > > "http://www.opentox.org/api/1.1#ModelPrediction"^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string to OntClass: it does not have rdf:type owl:Class or equivalent > > > > which means that http://www.opentox.org/api/1.1#ModelPrediction should > > be an Ontological Class (or at least a resource) but it's a literal - > > the error sources from > > http://toxcreate3.in-silico.ch/model/9304/predicted/value (see > > attachment). > > Thanks for alerting us! I hope to have fixed it in our development > branch. It will take some time until the new version makes it through > our tests to the master branch and to "offical" models. If you want to > test in the meantime you can use one of the models at > ot-test.in-silico.ch/model (after tomorrow). Ok, I'll check tomorrow again. > > > Question: Shouldn't all feature URIs follow the pattern /feature/{id}? > > As we do not have a separate feature store, features are kept under the > URI of the parent object (model or dataset as appropriate). I remember > faintly that we have discussed that some time ago on the mailing list > and we agreed that feature URIs as sub-URIs of other services are ok. > Ok, got it. But does it have an independent URI which should be somehow accessible? Not that it really matters... Just asking. > > Also I think that the triple: > > > > http://toxcreate3.in-silico.ch/model/9304/predicted/value > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI > > http://toxcreate3.in-silico.ch/model/9304/predicted/value > > > > is not much meaningful. > > Agreed, but ist valid OWL-DL ;-). Does it cause any problems - if not I > would prefer to keep it at the moment, because I fear to break other > parts of OWL-DL serialisation. > Are you sure it's OWL-DL valid? The validator at http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator doesn't take into account all ontological parameters - try Protege for a more thorough analysis. http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI is a datatype. I think however it will not cause any problems in ToxOtis and Q-edit. Best regards, Pantelis > > > > @All: > > Please use http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator to make sure that your > > representations are OWL-DL valid and http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ or > > http://inspector.sindice.com/index.jsp to check the structure of your > > RDFs. > > We do nightly tests with http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator (if it > is not down), but somehow prediction features slipped through. Sorry, > OWL-DL validation of prediction features should be in our tests by now. > > Best regards, > Christoph >
- Previous message: [OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
- Next message: [OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list